Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Period 7 -Basketball

Due Date: Wednesday, February 25th


The NCAA college basketball season is coming to a close and the NCAA tournament is just around the corner.   The article below is about who the sports analysts predict to become the next national championship team.    Please answer the question after reading the article and please remember to put your name on your Blog so that I can give you credit.


One Month To Go: SI writers pick their Final Four, national champion, more



It seems hard to believe, but there is a little less than a month left in the regular season. By this time next month, many teams will be tipping off their conference tournaments. Then it's Selection Sunday, the First Four and the Big Dance. Sports Illustrated college basketball writers Seth Davis, Luke Winn, Brian Hamilton and Lindsay Schnell make their early predictions for what we've been waiting for all season, the NCAA tournament.

Final Four teams and a darkhorse

writerfinal fourfinal fourfinal fourfinal fourDarkhorse
Seth Davis
Luke Winn
Brian Hamilton
Lindsay Schnell

National champion

DAVIS: Kentucky. The Wildcats could very well lose a regular season game, and maybe they won’t win the tournament. But if and when they lose, it won’t be because they haven't been tested. This team has shown that it can persevere in hostile road environments and during games when it is not at its best. If you give me Kentucky versus the field, I will take the field, but if I have to put my life savings on one team to win it all, this is the one.

WINN: Kentucky. The Wildcats' formula of best defense + major size/length advantage + most players with NBA futures + deep tournament experience makes them almost impossible to pick against. UK's offense is prone to lulls, but its defense is otherworldly enough to weather any scoring drought.
HAMILTON: Duke. I'm sticking with my preseason pick and going against all available logic and evidence. I concede this, Big Blue Nation. The best team in the country resides in Lexington and thus far has proven to be unbeatable. But it has appeared at least a little vulnerable. Duke isn't perfect, either, but it has several quality shooters, solid ball movement and poise to spare even if Jahlil Okafor isn't a factor. That's a good formula for beating anyone, possibly even the Wildcats.
SCHNELL: Kentucky. I know many of us wish there was more scoring in college hoops, but I’m a big believer that defense does win championships and because of that, I’ll take the Wildcats, who allow just 51 points per game. I’m continually impressed with Calipari’s ability to get five superstars to buy into the defensive end of the floor. Plus, if a game-winning shot is necessary, I like the Kentucky's chances with Aaron Harrison, who made three such shots in last year's tournament.

Not buying the hype on

DAVIS: Louisville. I love the Cardinals’ competitiveness, but I don’t love their inability to make jump shots and score in the halfcourt. I’m also concerned about their lack of bench production.

WINN: Louisville. I loved the Cards each of the previous two seasons, but this version has struggled mightily at three-point shooting and seems to lack the depth to contend for a title. They're one knockdown shooter and two reliable subs away from being great.
HAMILTON: The Big Ten. This league has sent teams to the Final Four in five of the past six years, but beyond Wisconsin there is not a lot to like this season. The Badgers, certainly, are cut from Final Four cloth. But one off night from freshman guard D'Angelo Russell and Ohio State is an endangered species. And Iowa? Michigan State? Illinois? Maryland? All seemed destined for toss-up tournament games, at best, in the Round of 64 or 32.
SCHNELL: Arizona. I like point guard T.J. McConnell’s game, but think about the teams that have beaten the Wildcats this season: UNLV, Oregon State and Arizona State. None of them are loaded with talent, and I question Arizona's ability to win six straight tournament games without an off night. My guess is the Wildcats get caught looking ahead in an early round, and it bites them in the rear.
Photo:

Midmajor to watch

DAVIS: Murray State. Steve Prohm has another terrific team. Much like the Isaiah Canaan-led 2012 squad that went 31-2, these Racers are spearheaded by Cameron Payne, an electric 6-foot-2 lefty who shoots, drives and finds teammates in a way that will remind you of Mike Conley. Murray State shares the ball, and as an older team it will have an advantage over its younger, power-conference opponents.
WINN: Eastern Washington. The Eagles are a deep cut -- more of a low-major, really -- but if they win the Big Sky Conference tournament, they'll be a problematic No. 15 or 16 seed. There are only three teams nationally that take more than 40 percent of their shots from long-range and make more than 40 percent of them: Iona, Denver and Eastern Washington -- and EWU has an electric scoring guard in Tyler Harvey, who leads the nation with 23.4 points per game.
HAMILTON: Northern Iowa. For these purposes, I don't count Gonzaga as a mid-major, given its as-usual high-major level of play. And I tried not to pick Northern Iowa. But it's Northern Iowa. The team poised to end Wichita State's Missouri Valley run has a top-40 offense and a top-20 defense, per kenpom.com, and it has a star in Seth Tuttle (15.8 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 61 percent shooting) to rely on.
SCHNELL: Iona. Want scoring? The Gaels can be your go-to team. Yes, defense is important, but being able to put points on the board -- something Iona has done well all year, averaging 82.5 per game -- is crucial in keeping up with high-octane teams from power leagues. Guard A.J. English (20.7 points, 5.6 rebounds) is the centerpiece, but don’t be surprised if guard Isaiah Williams (14.2 points), who is dealing with a foot injury should be healthy come tourney time, goes off.

Frank Kaminsky or Jahlil Okafor?

DAVIS: Why don’t you ask me who’s my favorite Olsen twin? These guys are close, but I would go with Okafor. Despite facing constant double teams, he is scoring at an incredibly efficient rate, and he is becoming a better passer. People knock his defense, but he also rarely gets into foul trouble, which is a huge plus.
WINN: Not only is Kaminsky the No. 1 scoring option for the nation's most efficient offense, he also has the the best defensive rebounding percentage in Big Ten play and serves as an adequate (read: better than Okafor) rim-protector. Frank The Tank is the clear frontrunner for the Wooden and Naismith Awards, and he'd have to go into a profound slump to lose them.
MORE CBB: Kaminsky leads Okafor in latest Wooden Watch
HAMILTON: If I'm assessing raw talent, it's Okafor, easily. But if I'm handing out a player of the year award, at the moment, it's Kaminsky. Okafor is mesmerizing in the post, but the differences in scoring and rebounding (18.0 and 9.1, respectively, for Okafor; 17.5 and 8.1 for Kaminsky) are negligible. Both are excellent passers. Kaminsky, meanwhile, can step out to stress a defense (24 three-pointers and 41 percent shooting from beyond the arc) and he's a better defender by a measurable margin (87.0 defensive rating to Okafor's 94.9). Two terrific players and there's no wrong answer.
SCHNELL: Of course I understand the hype surrounding Duke’s super freshman, but I’ll stick with the super senior. Kaminsky is fundamentally sound, poised and all-around hard to guard. His experience also gives him an advantage.

NCAA tournament breakout player

DAVIS: Seth Tuttle, Northern Iowa. This is the biggest reason why the Panthers are my darkhorse to go to the Final Four. If they advance, Tuttle will be the reason why. He’s a 6-8 senior forward who leads the team in points, rebounds and assists. He knows how to win.
WINN: Tuttle. He's the do-it-all forward you haven't seen enough of yet, leading the 22-2 Panthers in points, rebounds and assists (!). Don't be surprised if the Missouri Valley gets two teams in the Sweet 16, and Tuttle -- after four seasons of anonymously efficient labor in Cedar Falls -- finally gets some national attention.
HAMILTON: Kyle Wiltjer, Gonzaga.  So much of the who's-who of college basketball has been well established. But I wonder if the casual fan is hip to what the 6-10 junior, a former Kentucky role player, is doing in the Pacific Northwest. Wiljter has the nation's eighth-best offensive rating (130.2) and his 5.0 Win Shares tie with teammate Kevin Pangos for 10th most in the nation. Shooting 44 percent from long range, he'll be a matchup nightmare for anyone. He's playing with a comfort and swagger that is dangerous in March.
SCHNELL: J.J. Avila, Colorado State. The Rams will likely be a double-digit seed, but don’t be surprised if they pull off a few upsets behind senior forward Avila, who leads the team in points, rebounds and steals.

A bold prediction

DAVIS: Gonzaga will fail to get past the Sweet 16 -- again. I don’t mind saying I am openly rooting for the Bulldogs to get to Indianapolis, but once again they are being ill-served by a conference that does not provide enough tests to prepare for the rigors of March. Even their annual nonconference February matchup with Memphis turned out to be a dud, as the Zags won by 18.

WINN: Butler makes the Elite Eight (or beyond). Maybe the old Butler magic is affecting my ability to properly evaluate this team, but the Bulldogs seem to have the right combination of strong defense -- this is Butler's best D since 2010 -- and heady veteran playmakers in forward Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham to go on an NCAA tournament run.
HAMILTON: Some two or three seed goes down in the first round, and during the postgame television interview, the coach peels off a mask -- and it's Jim Boeheim! Approached by NCAA security folks toting their trash bags of non-sanctioned cups, Boeheim throws salt in their eyes and dashes off to a getaway car driven by Eric Devendorf. (If I must make a prediction, though, it's that a huge tournament game will be effectively decided by a terrible block-charge call. And either through tweaking the rule or the restricted arc, change will come in 2015-16 as a result.)
SCHNELL: No Pac-12 team advances past the Sweet 16. This might not be that bold given the lack of depth in the conference, but I’m not an Arizona believer and think Utah is a year away from a deep run. Add to that a wobbly Stanford squad, and I expect the conference of champions to be the conference of quick exits.


1. With a month left in college basketball, Kentucky still remains undefeated. Do you think they can win the NCAA tournament? Why? or Why not?

2. Where did Kyle Wittjer play before transferring to Gonzaga?

3. Who are Butler's strong defensive guards?

4.  Who is Northern Iowa's standout player this season?

5.  Which team do you think will win this year's NCAA tournament? Why?

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Michael Lu

1.I don't think they have a big chance because they have a strong offense, but not a strong defense. I think a good defense will produce a better offense.

2. He is a former Kentucky role player.

3. Butler's strong defensive guards are Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham.

4. Iowa's standout player is Seth Tuttle.

5. I think Duke will win the tournament because they have very talented players and maybe has the best player in college basketball.

Anonymous said...

Young Kim PD.7

1) I do think Kentucky has a chance of winning the NCAA tournament because of their excellent defense and athletic players. By athletic I mean, people that are naturally bigger. Kentucky has a major size/length advantage and has the best defense in modern era. Defense is the best offense.

2. Kyle Wittjer was a former Kentucky role player.

3.Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham

4.Seth Tuttle

5.I honestly do not watch or keep up with college basketball, but since Mrs. Dyer always says how Melo Trimble is...and watching some clips of him playing... I believe that MD can win it all. They can beat Wisconsin. Enough potential. Maryland all the way!

Anonymous said...

1.) I do believe that Kentucky can win the national championship because they have a great defense a lot of really talented players. But whether or not they actually win we will have to see and find out.

2.) Kyle Wittjer's former team was the Kentucky Wildcats.

3.) Butler's strong defensive guards are Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham.

4.) Northern Iowa's standout player is Seth Tuttle.

5.) I think that the Pitt Panthers will win the national championship because this last win versus UNC will have put them into the tournament, and they have upset some good teams and I think they can replicate that in the tournament. This is especially true when they are playing well and shooting the ball well like they did versus UNC.

- Andy Xiao, 9th Grader, WHS

Anonymous said...

Danny Quackenbush

1) No Kentucky wont win the tournament because they will get too confident and a team will take advantage of that in the tournament

2)He used to play at Kentucky

3) Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham

4)Seth Tuttle

5)Maryland will win because we ball like that

Anonymous said...

1. Yes, they have beat some teams that are going to be in the tournament, and they have the best frontcourt in the country. They also have solid frontcourt players.
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. Kentucky, they have the best frontcourt in the country. They also have solid frontcourt players.

Thomas Nguyen

Anonymous said...

-Edward Xiao
1. No because they are vulnerable and have not played an elite team recently
2. Kentucky
3. Kellen Dunham, Alex Barlow, and Roosevelt Jones
4.Seth Tuttle
5. UNC because they are my favorite team and I would not root for anyone else. They are also top 5 in rebounding and assists

Unknown said...

Andres Cisneros
1.-yes because the team is really strong and united.
2.- Kentucky
3.-forward Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4.-Seth Tuttle
5.-Kentucky , players are really good tactically and show amazing teamwork and talent.

Anonymous said...

True Martin
1.No, they arent as good as everybody else
2.he used to play for Kentucky
3.Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4.Seth Tuttle
5. I dont know i font watch basketball but i think Wisconsin has a chance

Unknown said...

1. I think Kentucky has a chance of winning because they have a good defense.
2. Kentucky
3.they have three strong defensive guards Kellen Dunham, Roosevelt Jones and Alex Barlow
4. Seth Tuttle
5. Kentucky because they have a really good defense and a god streak so they just have to keep playing well.

Leslie Nwosu