The NCAA college basketball season is coming to a close and the NCAA tournament is just around the corner. The article below is about who the sports analysts predict to become the next national championship team. Please answer the question after reading the article and please remember to put your name on your Blog so that I can give you credit.
One Month To Go: SI writers pick their Final Four, national champion, more
It seems hard to believe, but there is a little less than a month left in the regular season. By this time next month, many teams will be tipping off their conference tournaments. Then it's Selection Sunday, the First Four and the Big Dance. Sports Illustrated college basketball writers Seth Davis, Luke Winn, Brian Hamilton and Lindsay Schnell make their early predictions for what we've been waiting for all season, the NCAA tournament.
WINN: Kentucky. The Wildcats' formula of best defense + major size/length advantage + most players with NBA futures + deep tournament experience makes them almost impossible to pick against. UK's offense is prone to lulls, but its defense is otherworldly enough to weather any scoring drought.
HAMILTON: Duke. I'm sticking with my preseason pick and going against all available logic and evidence. I concede this, Big Blue Nation. The best team in the country resides in Lexington and thus far has proven to be unbeatable. But it has appeared at least a little vulnerable. Duke isn't perfect, either, but it has several quality shooters, solid ball movement and poise to spare even if Jahlil Okafor isn't a factor. That's a good formula for beating anyone, possibly even the Wildcats.
SCHNELL: Kentucky. I know many of us wish there was more scoring in college hoops, but I’m a big believer that defense does win championships and because of that, I’ll take the Wildcats, who allow just 51 points per game. I’m continually impressed with Calipari’s ability to get five superstars to buy into the defensive end of the floor. Plus, if a game-winning shot is necessary, I like the Kentucky's chances with Aaron Harrison, who made three such shots in last year's tournament.
WINN: Louisville. I loved the Cards each of the previous two seasons, but this version has struggled mightily at three-point shooting and seems to lack the depth to contend for a title. They're one knockdown shooter and two reliable subs away from being great.
HAMILTON: The Big Ten. This league has sent teams to the Final Four in five of the past six years, but beyond Wisconsin there is not a lot to like this season. The Badgers, certainly, are cut from Final Four cloth. But one off night from freshman guard D'Angelo Russell and Ohio State is an endangered species. And Iowa? Michigan State? Illinois? Maryland? All seemed destined for toss-up tournament games, at best, in the Round of 64 or 32.
SCHNELL: Arizona. I like point guard T.J. McConnell’s game, but think about the teams that have beaten the Wildcats this season: UNLV, Oregon State and Arizona State. None of them are loaded with talent, and I question Arizona's ability to win six straight tournament games without an off night. My guess is the Wildcats get caught looking ahead in an early round, and it bites them in the rear.
WINN: Eastern Washington. The Eagles are a deep cut -- more of a low-major, really -- but if they win the Big Sky Conference tournament, they'll be a problematic No. 15 or 16 seed. There are only three teams nationally that take more than 40 percent of their shots from long-range and make more than 40 percent of them: Iona, Denver and Eastern Washington -- and EWU has an electric scoring guard in Tyler Harvey, who leads the nation with 23.4 points per game.
HAMILTON: Northern Iowa. For these purposes, I don't count Gonzaga as a mid-major, given its as-usual high-major level of play. And I tried not to pick Northern Iowa. But it's Northern Iowa. The team poised to end Wichita State's Missouri Valley run has a top-40 offense and a top-20 defense, per kenpom.com, and it has a star in Seth Tuttle (15.8 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 61 percent shooting) to rely on.
SCHNELL: Iona. Want scoring? The Gaels can be your go-to team. Yes, defense is important, but being able to put points on the board -- something Iona has done well all year, averaging 82.5 per game -- is crucial in keeping up with high-octane teams from power leagues. Guard A.J. English (20.7 points, 5.6 rebounds) is the centerpiece, but don’t be surprised if guard Isaiah Williams (14.2 points), who is dealing with a foot injury should be healthy come tourney time, goes off.
WINN: Not only is Kaminsky the No. 1 scoring option for the nation's most efficient offense, he also has the the best defensive rebounding percentage in Big Ten play and serves as an adequate (read: better than Okafor) rim-protector. Frank The Tank is the clear frontrunner for the Wooden and Naismith Awards, and he'd have to go into a profound slump to lose them.
• MORE CBB: Kaminsky leads Okafor in latest Wooden Watch
HAMILTON: If I'm assessing raw talent, it's Okafor, easily. But if I'm handing out a player of the year award, at the moment, it's Kaminsky. Okafor is mesmerizing in the post, but the differences in scoring and rebounding (18.0 and 9.1, respectively, for Okafor; 17.5 and 8.1 for Kaminsky) are negligible. Both are excellent passers. Kaminsky, meanwhile, can step out to stress a defense (24 three-pointers and 41 percent shooting from beyond the arc) and he's a better defender by a measurable margin (87.0 defensive rating to Okafor's 94.9). Two terrific players and there's no wrong answer.
SCHNELL: Of course I understand the hype surrounding Duke’s super freshman, but I’ll stick with the super senior. Kaminsky is fundamentally sound, poised and all-around hard to guard. His experience also gives him an advantage.
WINN: Tuttle. He's the do-it-all forward you haven't seen enough of yet, leading the 22-2 Panthers in points, rebounds and assists (!). Don't be surprised if the Missouri Valley gets two teams in the Sweet 16, and Tuttle -- after four seasons of anonymously efficient labor in Cedar Falls -- finally gets some national attention.
HAMILTON: Kyle Wiltjer, Gonzaga. So much of the who's-who of college basketball has been well established. But I wonder if the casual fan is hip to what the 6-10 junior, a former Kentucky role player, is doing in the Pacific Northwest. Wiljter has the nation's eighth-best offensive rating (130.2) and his 5.0 Win Shares tie with teammate Kevin Pangos for 10th most in the nation. Shooting 44 percent from long range, he'll be a matchup nightmare for anyone. He's playing with a comfort and swagger that is dangerous in March.
SCHNELL: J.J. Avila, Colorado State. The Rams will likely be a double-digit seed, but don’t be surprised if they pull off a few upsets behind senior forward Avila, who leads the team in points, rebounds and steals.
WINN: Butler makes the Elite Eight (or beyond). Maybe the old Butler magic is affecting my ability to properly evaluate this team, but the Bulldogs seem to have the right combination of strong defense -- this is Butler's best D since 2010 -- and heady veteran playmakers in forward Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham to go on an NCAA tournament run.
HAMILTON: Some two or three seed goes down in the first round, and during the postgame television interview, the coach peels off a mask -- and it's Jim Boeheim! Approached by NCAA security folks toting their trash bags of non-sanctioned cups, Boeheim throws salt in their eyes and dashes off to a getaway car driven by Eric Devendorf. (If I must make a prediction, though, it's that a huge tournament game will be effectively decided by a terrible block-charge call. And either through tweaking the rule or the restricted arc, change will come in 2015-16 as a result.)
SCHNELL: No Pac-12 team advances past the Sweet 16. This might not be that bold given the lack of depth in the conference, but I’m not an Arizona believer and think Utah is a year away from a deep run. Add to that a wobbly Stanford squad, and I expect the conference of champions to be the conference of quick exits.
1. With a month left in college basketball, Kentucky still remains undefeated. Do you think they can win the NCAA tournament? Why? or Why not?
2. Where did Kyle Wittjer play before transferring to Gonzaga?
3. Who are Butler's strong defensive guards?
4. Who is Northern Iowa's standout player this season?
5. Which team do you think will win this year's NCAA tournament? Why?
Final Four teams and a darkhorse
writer | final four | final four | final four | final four | Darkhorse |
Seth Davis | |||||
Luke Winn | |||||
Brian Hamilton | |||||
Lindsay Schnell |
National champion
DAVIS: Kentucky. The Wildcats could very well lose a regular season game, and maybe they won’t win the tournament. But if and when they lose, it won’t be because they haven't been tested. This team has shown that it can persevere in hostile road environments and during games when it is not at its best. If you give me Kentucky versus the field, I will take the field, but if I have to put my life savings on one team to win it all, this is the one.WINN: Kentucky. The Wildcats' formula of best defense + major size/length advantage + most players with NBA futures + deep tournament experience makes them almost impossible to pick against. UK's offense is prone to lulls, but its defense is otherworldly enough to weather any scoring drought.
HAMILTON: Duke. I'm sticking with my preseason pick and going against all available logic and evidence. I concede this, Big Blue Nation. The best team in the country resides in Lexington and thus far has proven to be unbeatable. But it has appeared at least a little vulnerable. Duke isn't perfect, either, but it has several quality shooters, solid ball movement and poise to spare even if Jahlil Okafor isn't a factor. That's a good formula for beating anyone, possibly even the Wildcats.
SCHNELL: Kentucky. I know many of us wish there was more scoring in college hoops, but I’m a big believer that defense does win championships and because of that, I’ll take the Wildcats, who allow just 51 points per game. I’m continually impressed with Calipari’s ability to get five superstars to buy into the defensive end of the floor. Plus, if a game-winning shot is necessary, I like the Kentucky's chances with Aaron Harrison, who made three such shots in last year's tournament.
Not buying the hype on
DAVIS: Louisville. I love the Cardinals’ competitiveness, but I don’t love their inability to make jump shots and score in the halfcourt. I’m also concerned about their lack of bench production.WINN: Louisville. I loved the Cards each of the previous two seasons, but this version has struggled mightily at three-point shooting and seems to lack the depth to contend for a title. They're one knockdown shooter and two reliable subs away from being great.
HAMILTON: The Big Ten. This league has sent teams to the Final Four in five of the past six years, but beyond Wisconsin there is not a lot to like this season. The Badgers, certainly, are cut from Final Four cloth. But one off night from freshman guard D'Angelo Russell and Ohio State is an endangered species. And Iowa? Michigan State? Illinois? Maryland? All seemed destined for toss-up tournament games, at best, in the Round of 64 or 32.
SCHNELL: Arizona. I like point guard T.J. McConnell’s game, but think about the teams that have beaten the Wildcats this season: UNLV, Oregon State and Arizona State. None of them are loaded with talent, and I question Arizona's ability to win six straight tournament games without an off night. My guess is the Wildcats get caught looking ahead in an early round, and it bites them in the rear.
Midmajor to watch
DAVIS: Murray State. Steve Prohm has another terrific team. Much like the Isaiah Canaan-led 2012 squad that went 31-2, these Racers are spearheaded by Cameron Payne, an electric 6-foot-2 lefty who shoots, drives and finds teammates in a way that will remind you of Mike Conley. Murray State shares the ball, and as an older team it will have an advantage over its younger, power-conference opponents.WINN: Eastern Washington. The Eagles are a deep cut -- more of a low-major, really -- but if they win the Big Sky Conference tournament, they'll be a problematic No. 15 or 16 seed. There are only three teams nationally that take more than 40 percent of their shots from long-range and make more than 40 percent of them: Iona, Denver and Eastern Washington -- and EWU has an electric scoring guard in Tyler Harvey, who leads the nation with 23.4 points per game.
HAMILTON: Northern Iowa. For these purposes, I don't count Gonzaga as a mid-major, given its as-usual high-major level of play. And I tried not to pick Northern Iowa. But it's Northern Iowa. The team poised to end Wichita State's Missouri Valley run has a top-40 offense and a top-20 defense, per kenpom.com, and it has a star in Seth Tuttle (15.8 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 61 percent shooting) to rely on.
SCHNELL: Iona. Want scoring? The Gaels can be your go-to team. Yes, defense is important, but being able to put points on the board -- something Iona has done well all year, averaging 82.5 per game -- is crucial in keeping up with high-octane teams from power leagues. Guard A.J. English (20.7 points, 5.6 rebounds) is the centerpiece, but don’t be surprised if guard Isaiah Williams (14.2 points), who is dealing with a foot injury should be healthy come tourney time, goes off.
Frank Kaminsky or Jahlil Okafor?
DAVIS: Why don’t you ask me who’s my favorite Olsen twin? These guys are close, but I would go with Okafor. Despite facing constant double teams, he is scoring at an incredibly efficient rate, and he is becoming a better passer. People knock his defense, but he also rarely gets into foul trouble, which is a huge plus.WINN: Not only is Kaminsky the No. 1 scoring option for the nation's most efficient offense, he also has the the best defensive rebounding percentage in Big Ten play and serves as an adequate (read: better than Okafor) rim-protector. Frank The Tank is the clear frontrunner for the Wooden and Naismith Awards, and he'd have to go into a profound slump to lose them.
• MORE CBB: Kaminsky leads Okafor in latest Wooden Watch
HAMILTON: If I'm assessing raw talent, it's Okafor, easily. But if I'm handing out a player of the year award, at the moment, it's Kaminsky. Okafor is mesmerizing in the post, but the differences in scoring and rebounding (18.0 and 9.1, respectively, for Okafor; 17.5 and 8.1 for Kaminsky) are negligible. Both are excellent passers. Kaminsky, meanwhile, can step out to stress a defense (24 three-pointers and 41 percent shooting from beyond the arc) and he's a better defender by a measurable margin (87.0 defensive rating to Okafor's 94.9). Two terrific players and there's no wrong answer.
SCHNELL: Of course I understand the hype surrounding Duke’s super freshman, but I’ll stick with the super senior. Kaminsky is fundamentally sound, poised and all-around hard to guard. His experience also gives him an advantage.
NCAA tournament breakout player
DAVIS: Seth Tuttle, Northern Iowa. This is the biggest reason why the Panthers are my darkhorse to go to the Final Four. If they advance, Tuttle will be the reason why. He’s a 6-8 senior forward who leads the team in points, rebounds and assists. He knows how to win.WINN: Tuttle. He's the do-it-all forward you haven't seen enough of yet, leading the 22-2 Panthers in points, rebounds and assists (!). Don't be surprised if the Missouri Valley gets two teams in the Sweet 16, and Tuttle -- after four seasons of anonymously efficient labor in Cedar Falls -- finally gets some national attention.
HAMILTON: Kyle Wiltjer, Gonzaga. So much of the who's-who of college basketball has been well established. But I wonder if the casual fan is hip to what the 6-10 junior, a former Kentucky role player, is doing in the Pacific Northwest. Wiljter has the nation's eighth-best offensive rating (130.2) and his 5.0 Win Shares tie with teammate Kevin Pangos for 10th most in the nation. Shooting 44 percent from long range, he'll be a matchup nightmare for anyone. He's playing with a comfort and swagger that is dangerous in March.
SCHNELL: J.J. Avila, Colorado State. The Rams will likely be a double-digit seed, but don’t be surprised if they pull off a few upsets behind senior forward Avila, who leads the team in points, rebounds and steals.
A bold prediction
DAVIS: Gonzaga will fail to get past the Sweet 16 -- again. I don’t mind saying I am openly rooting for the Bulldogs to get to Indianapolis, but once again they are being ill-served by a conference that does not provide enough tests to prepare for the rigors of March. Even their annual nonconference February matchup with Memphis turned out to be a dud, as the Zags won by 18.WINN: Butler makes the Elite Eight (or beyond). Maybe the old Butler magic is affecting my ability to properly evaluate this team, but the Bulldogs seem to have the right combination of strong defense -- this is Butler's best D since 2010 -- and heady veteran playmakers in forward Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham to go on an NCAA tournament run.
HAMILTON: Some two or three seed goes down in the first round, and during the postgame television interview, the coach peels off a mask -- and it's Jim Boeheim! Approached by NCAA security folks toting their trash bags of non-sanctioned cups, Boeheim throws salt in their eyes and dashes off to a getaway car driven by Eric Devendorf. (If I must make a prediction, though, it's that a huge tournament game will be effectively decided by a terrible block-charge call. And either through tweaking the rule or the restricted arc, change will come in 2015-16 as a result.)
SCHNELL: No Pac-12 team advances past the Sweet 16. This might not be that bold given the lack of depth in the conference, but I’m not an Arizona believer and think Utah is a year away from a deep run. Add to that a wobbly Stanford squad, and I expect the conference of champions to be the conference of quick exits.
1. With a month left in college basketball, Kentucky still remains undefeated. Do you think they can win the NCAA tournament? Why? or Why not?
2. Where did Kyle Wittjer play before transferring to Gonzaga?
3. Who are Butler's strong defensive guards?
4. Who is Northern Iowa's standout player this season?
5. Which team do you think will win this year's NCAA tournament? Why?
26 comments:
Nick J
1. If Kentucky can carry their great defense into the the march madness tournament, they will have a high chance of winning it all.
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. I believe Kentucky will win it all because their defense is among best in the country.
Dane Meddings
1 if Kentucky can keep up the defense then they can win march madness
2 kentucky
3 alex barlow,rossevelt jones, kellen dunham
4 the Kentucky defense is very good but I think others may have a chance aswell. Kentucky is my bet on winning though
Maxwell Redding
1. I do believe Kentucky can win the NCAA tournament because they have talent on the offensive side of the ball as well as on the defensive side of the ball.
2. Kyle Wittjer played at Kentucky before transferring to Gonzaga.
3. Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham.
4. Seth Tuttle
5. I believe that Villinova will win the NCAA tournament because of their unmatched three point shooting and they only have 2 loses on the season which will make them a threat to Kentucky during March Madness.
Maxwell Redding
1. Yes I think Kentucky can win if they continue having an amazing defense in the march madness tournament. I think they will have a chance of winning.
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. I think Kentucky will win because their defense is amazing and they have not lost a game yet.
1-Kentucky needs to keep their defense in shape but if the allow one slip-up I don't think they can pull it off.
2-Kentucky
3-Roosevelt Jones, Alex Barlow, and Kellen Dunham.
4-Seth Tuttle
5-I think either Wisconsin or Duke will win the Tournament this year based upon both teams recent performances in previous games.
AJ Turner
KEvin Choi
1. Kentucky's defense and experience will allow them to win the championship.
2. Kentucky.
3. Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. KEntuckys defensive rotations and offensive style will allow them to win it all
Arthur Zimmer P.4
1) if Kentucky keeps playing the way they have been, they will win the tournament, but if their defense weakens in someway, they will have a much tougher time.
2)Kentucky
3)Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4)Seth Tuttle
5)I think Wisconsin will win because their offense has been playing incredibly well by keeping the ball in their hands and using their size to their advantage.
Tyler Mouzon
1. I think the chances of Kentucky winning are good but I don't think they can win simply from lack of experience.
2.Kentucky
3.Roosevelt Jones, Alex Barlow, Kellen Dunham
4. Seth tuttle
5.I believe Duke will win beause of their dominant all-around game and lack of dependence on one player
Andy Lee
1. Yes, they have the best chance with their undefeated score. They also have very skilled players.
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jones, Alex Barlow, and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. As I said in the first question, I think Kentucky will win because of their strong streak and excellent players
Aliya Rahman
1. I believe that Kentucky can win the NCAA tournament because defense wins games.
2. He played on Kentucky
3. Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. I would have to still go with Kentucky because of their amazing defense and numerous advantages aside from their offense.
Julia stern-
1. I do think that Kentucky can win because their defense is amazing, and it could be the root of the championship trophy.
2. he played for Kentucky
3. Roosevelt jones, alex barlow and kellen durham
4. seth tuttle
5. I think Kentucky will win. They are outstanding in the defensive area and dominate there.
1.)Kentucky will win the tournament because of their depth and good offense
2.)Kentucky
3.)Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4.)Seth Tuttle
5.)Kentucky because they want to win this year since they lost in last year's championship.
Costa Borsas
1) Kentucky brings a strong offensive game, while also having great defense but several teams have good chances at beating Kentucky including Virginia and Duke with their own offense and defense that can easily keep up with Kentucky.
2) Kentucky
3)Alex Barlow, Kellen Dunham, and Roosevelt Jones
4)Seth Tuttle
5)Virginia will win the NCAA tournament with their great ball movement and overall offense and defense.
Brendan Lam
pd. 4
1)Kentucky brings great offense and defense against all their opponents and has shown w/ their record, but several teams such as Duke and Virginia can easily match them and even take over them and win the NCAA tournament.
2)Kentucky
3)Alex Barlow, Kellen Dunham, and Roosevelt Jones
4)Seth Tuttle
5)Virginia with their excellent ball movement and overall good offensive and defensive game.
Brendan Lam
Pd. 4
1. Kentuckey has the best chance. Their undefeated and seem to be overall better.
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. I believe Kentucky will win it all because their defense is exceptional and they seem to know what they are doing.
Ralik Davis
4th Period
Josh M
1. If they continue to play good defense and motivated offense they can win the National Championship.
2.Kenutcky
3.Barlow and Dunham along with Roosevelt Jones
4. S. Tuttle
5. I think Virginia will win because they are an all round good team with great defense and offense.
1.)Kentucky needs to continue playing at a fast pace and play great defense in order to go far in the tourney
2.)Kentucky
3.)Roosevelt Jomes and Alex Barlow(guard) and Kellen Dunham(guard)
4.)Seth Tuttle
5.)I think that Virginia will win because they have so many threats to turn to for big moments
Drew Shrager
1. Kentucky can win the NCAA tournament if they use their great defense.
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jones, Kellen Dunham, And Alex Barlow
4. Seth Tuttle
5. Duke because they have solid three point shotters.
1. I think Kentucky will win because they have the best overall team and definitely have the most talent in the ncaa
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. Kentucky
Chase Erat
Keon Morris
1. Kentucky will win if they use there great defense
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jones, Kellen Dunham, Alex Barlow
4. Seth Tuttle
5. Virginia
Michael Lin.
1. If Kentucky can carry their great defense into the the march madness tournament, they will win.
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jones and guards Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. I believe Kentucky will win it all because their defense is the best.
1. If Kentucky can play their normally and defense perfectly in the tournament,they will win.
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jonesand and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. I think Kentucky will win because they can defense perfectly.But other teams also have chance to win the game.
Bruce chen
1. yes do think they could win it all because of there high powered defense
2. Kentucky
3. Alex Barlow, Kellen Dunham and Roosevelt Jones
4. Seth Tuttle
5. Kentucky because there on a roll and they play great team defense
1) it depends if kentucky play defense they can win march madness
2) kentucky
3)Roosevelt jones , kellen dunlham, and alex barlow
4)i think the defense of kentucky is very good but don't underestimates the opponents they are good too
JOseph , mbongue
february 25, 2015 at 11:49 pm
1. Kentucky is one of many good teams. I think their an automatic elite 8, but what happens after that is up in the air.
2, Kentucky
3.Roosevelt Jones, Kellen Dunham, Alex Barlow
4. Seth Tuttle
5. I think Duke or Virginia will win, but i hope Ohio State wins
Brian Barrett
period 5
1. Kentucky's defense will lead them to the win.
2. Kentucky
3. Roosevelt Jones, Alex Barlow and Kellen Dunham
4. Seth Tuttle
5. Kentucky. This is because of the depth in talent they have. They have ten players who can really play efficiently and effectively.
~Justin Feldman
Post a Comment