Because college basketball is just around the corner, I thought this would be a good assignment to get you thinking about college basketball and different coaching styles.
The article below is about 4 highly accomplished Division 1 colloge basketball coaches. Please read the article and answer the questions below. Please remember to put your name on your Blog so that I can give you credit.
John
Calipari and Rick Pitino
ESPN.com
It
ain't easy being John Calipari.
But
that doesn't mean it's easy.
In
fact, the advantages of Calipari's job can frequently double as its drawbacks.
That insane talent only raises expectations, expectations that create in fans
not hope but demands: win or else. Every move on this team is scrutinized by a
local media corps year-round, 24/7, 365. The position Calipari has put himself
in with this team is enviable, sure, but it is also tenuous; there is absolutely
no margin for error.
Which
only makes the coaching job he's done this season all the more impressive.
First, Calipari had to assemble this juggernaut. (Recruiting is often overlooked
in coach-of-the-year discussions, but why?) Then, he had to solder disparate
talented parts -- the kind of top-end AAU stars who might easily bristle against
diminished roles -- into a basketball team even better than the sum of its
parts. Then, he had to guide that team through the maelstrom that is basketball
season in Kentucky, particularly a basketball season in which nothing but a
national title can be considered a success.
The
Wildcats are very nearly there. Does Calipari have the best talent in the
country? No question. Are Calipari's problems of the high-class variety? Oh
yeah. But high-class problems are still problems, and no coach in the country --
through the media, through point-perfect long-view guidance, through in-season
adjustments designed to maximize each player's ability -- manages them better
than the governor of BBN.
Sure,
sure: Saying Calipari's job is hard is like saying driving a Maserati is too
stressful. But the driver still has to hit his turns, and Coach Cal hasn't
missed one.
--
Eamonn Brennan
Rick
Pitino insisted that, outside the birth of his three children, no day in his
life was better than this past Saturday, when Louisville topped Florida to make
it to the Final Four.
It
sounded like adrenaline-fueled hyperbole, but Pitino makes a valid point. On a
résumé dotted with impressive results, this season just might be the most
miraculous and magical, not to mention the best coaching job in Pitino's
illustrious career.
Louisville
is going to New Orleans despite a roster that read like an NFL injured reserve
list -- Mike Marra (done for the season, ACL injury), Rakeem Buckles (done for the season, ACL injury),
Stephan Van Treese (done for the season, patellar
injury), Wayne Blackshear (out 25 games, shoulder injury),
Peyton Siva (missed three games, ankle injury,
concussion), Kyle Kuric (missed three games, ankle injury), Jared Swopshire (missed two games, groin injury).
But
mostly Louisville is going to New Orleans because a would-be (should-be) Hall of
Fame coach pushed every right button at every critical juncture. When injuries
decimated his roster, Pitino slowed things down, and when everyone finally got
healthy, he went back to his roots, pushing the tempo and turning a team that is
short on offensive savvy into a defensive swarm.
No
one will even try to argue that this is among Pitino's top-five (top 10?)
talented teams, but what the Cards may lack in skill, they make up for in
gumption. They are relentless, a team that never seems to accept the fact that
it can't or shouldn't be able to come back.
In
a high-end Final Four, Louisville is the only real underdog, a team that limped
into the postseason, losing four of its final six regular-season
games.
Yet
Louisville is going to New Orleans because one of the most successful coaches in
the game did the best job of his career.
--
Dana O'Neil
Thad
Matta and Bill Self
ESPN.com
In
late February, Thad Matta curtailed the bravado of a talented Buckeyes squad by
kicking his team out of practice.
Ohio
State became a national title contender the moment that Jared Sullinger
fulfilled his promise to return for his sophomore season. Lost in that signature
development, however, was the team's reliance on youth and the leadership void
left by three graduating seniors.
The
Buckeyes endured a 2-3 stretch in February that warranted questions about the
way they'd end the season. Yes, they had weapons, but without the proper drive,
they'd never achieve what their abilities suggested they were capable of
accomplishing.
Enter
Matta.
His
elite coaching prowess has been proved by the development within his program.
Deshaun Thomas enters the Final Four as one of the most potent scorers in the
field. Aaron Craft's defensive fortitude has disrupted offense strategies all
season. Sullinger lost weight and added new offensive wrinkles to his game under
Matta's watch, too.
But
the head coach deserves just as much credit for his ability to mold this young
group mentally. Matta didn't have the veteran leaders who had led some of his
Buckeyes teams in recent years, and unlike his 2006-07 NCAA national runner-up
squad, he didn't have three first-round picks.
Matta's
tutelage, however, fueled a rapid maturation process that equipped the Buckeyes
with the proper mindset in March, even though they didn't appear to have it in
late February. Every time his youthful team moved off track, Matta brought it
back. Sometimes, he had to praise players after tough outings. On other
occasions, he had to humble them like the day he booted them from
practice.
But
in the best coaching performance of his career, Matta became Ohio State's
maestro.
And
that's why the Buckeyes are still making music.
--
Myron Medcalf
Back
in October, a few days after the start of official workouts, Bill Self
re-evaluated his expectations for this season's
squad.
Coaches
often downplay the potential of their team, but in this case, Self's concern
seemed genuine. The Jayhawks had lost four starters and six of the top eight
players from a roster that finished 35-3 the previous season. Only two returning
players -- point guard Tyshawn Taylor and forward Thomas Robinson -- averaged
more than four points per game in 2010-11.
When
Kansas defeated Ohio State at Allen Fieldhouse in December, Self was thrilled,
for reasons you may not expect.
"We
needed a feather in our cap," said Self, whose team had already lost to Kentucky
and Duke. "We needed to beat someone to get into the tournament. At that point
we hadn't done it."
Four
months later, Kansas is preparing to play Ohio State again -- in the Final Four.
It
happened because of Self, who has turned what was supposedly his worst team into
one of his best. This is the second Final Four appearance for Self, who has won
more games than any other college coach in America since his arrival at Kansas
in 2003-04. Self sparked KU to the NCAA title in 2008. As impressive as his
efforts were then, his excellence has been magnified more this season than in
any other in his career.
In
Robinson, Self took a player who averaged a little more than 14 minutes off the
bench last season and turned him into a Wooden Award candidate.
Taylor,
a third-team All-American, went from being one of the most criticized players in
KU history to one of the most loved. Self transformed role players such as Jeff
Withey, Elijah Johnson and Travis Releford -- all of whom averaged between two
and four points last season -- into solid players and
contributors.
Kansas
advanced to the Final Four by beating a North Carolina team that played six
McDonald's All-Americans. The Jayhawks don't have any. With Self on the
sideline, it didn't matter.
It
hasn't all season.
--
Jason King
2. Based on what you read, who is the best coach and why? Please give 2 reasons to support your answer.
3. When a team wins a championship, do you think that means that team had the best coach? Please give 2 reasons to support your answer.
18 comments:
1)Louisville
2)Bill Self because he took his team from not being so good to really pulling it together and helping even the most average players grow
3)No, sometimes the team just clicks and the coach just helps around the rough parts. Surly, the winners have a decent or good coach but doesn't mean he was the best. There's a lot that goes into a good team a coach being a big part in it but not the end all.
Meghan Wright :)
1. louisville
2. thad matta- fueled the maturation of players, and inspires players by praising after tough outings.
3.No, i dont think its necessarily the best coach but the teamwork all together. Eric spoelstra in my opinion is not the best coach. but with the talent that the big 3 has theres no way they dont win. doc rivers on the other hand is a excellent coach with experience but only has 1 championship.
-Clement Zhang
1. Louisville with Rick Pinito
2. In my opinion Rick Pinito, because a lot of people on his roster were injured and some out for the whole season but he slowed things down worked with them and won the championship. Another reason is because his team was a bit undersized but they still held their own and became a "Defensive Swarm"
3. I think its half and half because the coach must have worked hard and gave them plays and mentored them but on the other hand you cant teach talent and that is what the players bring.
Abdoulai Jobe
Sophia Hussein
1)Louisville
2) Rick Pitino, with a roster filled with injuries he was able to work around that obstacle and make it work. His swarm defense, he was able to create and implement a system that worked for his team.
3)No, because the players are the ones who are actually on the court, in order for a team to be successful the players must be able to make decisions during the game, even though the coach is on the sidelines, the coach is responsible for mentoring and giving their players the resources they need to succeed.
1. louisville
2. rick pinito. because even though they lost alot of players, they still were able to beat syaracuse in the final four.
3. no. it just means that the coach was more determined than the other teams in the division. the coaches set a goal for themselves.
mclean djouha
Jeff Revinzon
1. Louisville
2. Rick Pitino. he won the NCAA championship despite having a very mediocre back court. Hid team was also heavily affected by injuries yet he found a way to make his scheme/plan work with whatever personal he had.
3. No. A coach can only do so much, a lot of it comes down to can the players execute the system the couch put in place. Also taking a look at Paul Westhead who won a NBA championship with the Lakers in 1971 he went on to finish his carer with a record of 183-224.
Phillip Garrett
#1 Louisville
#2 rick pitino because he still was able to get the job done with all the injuries his team had and because of his defensive swarm
#3 I think it is both the players and the coach because the players are the ones that are on the court but the coach is the one to correct them and get them great to do well when they get on the court
Phillip garrett
1.) Louisville
2.) Rick Pitino because with a roster with lots of injured players he was still able to make it work. He also enforced the "Defwensive Swarm" which became one of the nations best defenses.
3.) No he coaches the players, but the results of games are based on the players and how they play. The best coach couldnt make the worst players a good team.
Radley Ellenbogen
1.Louisville
2. I think Bill Self was the best coach because he was able to turn a team from being a bad team to a team being amazing.
3.I think that no, if a team wins they don't have the best coach. The players can still come out even if they don't have a great coach like them working together or being very skillful at basketball
Dennis Xia Period 2
1. Louisville Cardinals.
2. Rick Pitino. His team was filled injuries, he was able to work around the obstacle and got the job done. His "Swarm Defense" provided a system where he was able to create and implement the system for his team to be successful.
3. No, not necessarily, it's both the coach and the teamwork combined.
-Alex Kuang
Mattin Gharagozloo
1. Louisville
2. Rick Pinito because even with players who were injured and out for the game/season, he pushed his team to victory and didn't let that stop him
3. no, mainly because the players are the ones playing, not the coach so they're not the one the field and the players make the final decisions that ultimately decide whether they win or lose
1. Louisville won
2. Thad matta because he made a losing team into contenders for a national championship and he communicates with all of his players.
3. No I do not because a team can get "lucky" with the players that they get. The players can either be familiar with each other or really talented.
1.) Louisville
2.) Rick Pitino because when six of his best eight players were injured, he slowed things down, and when everyone finally got healthy he "went back to his roots," pushing the tempo and turning a team that is short on offensive savvy into a "defensive swarm." Also, Rick Pitino turned one of his least talented teams, into one of his top ten.
3.) No, it is not so much about how the coach leads the team, but it is the teamwork that brings the team together as one. Also, to have a good team you need players with talent.
-Ben Murk
1.Louisville
2. Rick Pinito becasue he took an god but not great team and won the NCAA championship
3.The coach becasue he is making the players smarter, faster, and better.
Brian Barrett
1. Louisvulle won the 2013 championship.
2. Maggie Dyer is the best coach for 2 reasons. 1 she coaches the woottton girls basketball team and 2, she is my teacher.
3. It haas more to do with the team so if the team wins, it doesnt automatically mean that they have the best coach.
Sawyer Hazel
1. Louisville with Rick Pinito
2. I think Rick Pinito because a lot of people on his roster were injured and some out for the whole season but he still won the championship. He also used the "Defensive Swarm" which became one of the best defenses.
3. No because the players are the ones winning the games. A great coach couldn't make a terrible team great. You need great players.
-Michael Kolodin
1. Louisville
2. Rick Pitino. he won the NCAA championship despite having a very mediocre back court. Hid team was also heavily affected by injuries yet he found a way to make his scheme/plan work with whatever personal he had.
3. No. A coach can only do so much, a lot of it comes down to can the players execute the system the couch put in place. Also taking a look at Paul Westhead who won a NBA championship with the Lakers in 1971 he went on to finish his carer with a record of 183-224.
-Malik Bleau
Nick Jordan
1. louisville
2. rick pinito. because he was able to carry the team when they lost alot of players.
3. no. because the players are the ones making the decisions.
Post a Comment