Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Period 6 - Basketball

Due Date, Wednesday, May 18th


As we are wrapping up and 3 on 3 unit, I thought it would be a good idea to start taking a look the NBA play-offs, since 5 on 5 will be our next unit.  As a player and Coach, I often question officiating.  Please read the article below and answer the following questions.

The insane details of the best 13.5 seconds of the NBA playoffs




SAN ANTONIO – Game 2 of the Western Conference semifinal series between the San Antonio Spurs and Oklahoma City Thunder was possibly the best game so far during the NBA playoffs – with the Thunder emerging with a 98-97 win Monday night to even the series at a game apiece – but the only thing anyone will be talking about Tuesday is the wild final 13.5 seconds.
It was a memorable sequence for a variety of reasons – one that included several possible violations and fouls, none of which were called. And, in a strange twist that basically didn’t matter, San Antonio got a chance to take the lead in the final moments.
Here’s how those final seconds played out, including thoughts from virtually everyone involved in the play, which you can see in its entirety below:
13.5 seconds left
After LaMarcus Aldridge was fouled by Serge Ibaka on a three-pointer and made all three free throws to pull San Antonio within 98-97, the Thunder called its final timeout. Coach Billy Donovan had Dion Waiters inbound the ball on the sideline.
As referee Marc Davis handed Waiters the ball and began counting off five seconds, Waiters knew, with no timeouts left, that he had to get the ball inbounds.
“Man, to be honest with you, I was caught up in the game,” Waiters said. “I don’t really know what happened, to be honest with you.
“My whole thing was trying to get the ball in there with no timeouts.”
As Waiters moved perilously close to committing a five-second infraction, he appeared to panic. First, he used his arm to push Manu Ginobili, who was defending him on the play, away from him to create enough space to inbound the ball.
“I was trying to rip the ball, and he kind of created room with his elbow,” Ginobili said. “But things happen. It’s a very awkward play, doesn’t happen very often, so I guess they didn’t see it.
“I don’t know what it is, to tell you the truth, what type of violation it is. It had to be something.”
It turned out to be something, as crew chief Ken Mauer said to a pool reporter after Monday’s game that Waiters had committed an offensive foul on the play, and the ball should’ve been given to San Antonio.
“On the floor we did not see a foul on the play,” Mauer said. “However, upon review, we realize and we agree we should have [called] an offensive foul on the play. It’s a play we’ve never seen before, ever. We should have had an offensive foul on the play.”
Waiters then committed a second violation – he jumped in the air to make the pass, which an inbounder is not allowed to do.
Waiters contended that Ginobili had committed his own violation: stepping over the out-of-bounds line.
“I didn’t really get a look at it,” Waiters said. “But hopefully they’re going to look at it and they’ll see he stepped out and it should’ve been a tech, too, but it’s not up to me.
“If you go look at it, you’ll see. It should’ve been a tech and the ball back. But when they go look at it and they’ll figure it out, and they’ll see the truth, it’s a play on.”
What was unclear was whether Ginobili stepped over the line (he appeared to step on it, which is apparently allowed, but not over it, which is not). And it’s also unclear if Ginobili gave Waiters enough room to inbound the ball.
12.9 seconds left
Waiters eventually lobbed the ball into Kevin Durant at center court – where he was being guarded by Spurs guard Danny Green. For some reason, though, the game clock started before anyone touched the ball, meaning an extra half-second went off before Durant’s hands got on it.
“I thought maybe they would call something [on Waiters],” Green said. “I wasn’t sure. I was trying to see where he was going, I tried to deny. [Then] I thought maybe he would call timeout, and I was just at that one point, once you deny, I was trying to play safety.
“I could see where [Waiters] was looking, and I thought maybe we would’ve got a call, but we didn’t. But he threw it up, and I just went to try to go get it.”
As Durant fell to the ground, it appeared Green may have gotten a piece of him as he poked the ball away. But after Green hesitated for a moment — only to realize nothing was going to be called — he immediately began to seek an opportunity to press his advantage.
10 seconds left
Once Green had the ball, he saw two people ahead of him — Thunder center Steven Adams and Spurs guard Patty Mills. Green tried to loop the ball over Adams’s head to Mills, but his pass was long, forcing Mills to almost go under the basket to catch it. On top of that, Green had missed Ginobili streaking past him on his right. If he had seen him, it would’ve resulted in a simple 2-on-1 and a likely layup for the Spurs.
“I saw Adams in front of me. I didn’t know if they called [a foul] or not, but I wanted to make sure I got the ball first,” Green said. “But I saw Adams in front of me, I saw Patty, and [Adams] is a big body so I just tried to throw it over top of him.
“It was a lofty pass, it wasn’t a good one, and it took some time to get there, but I didn’t have a chance to see who was to the right of me, and it was Manu.”
Eight seconds left
After Mills wound up with the ball under the basket, he swung it over to Ginobili, who had run past Green and back into the play. From there, Ginobili dribbled into the lane — where Adams was there again, standing between Ginobili and the basket.
“We were just trying to inbound it and then it was just a scramble, mate,” Adams said. “I just tried to do the best I could.
“The team did, scrambling, and contest everything. We got lucky. We got really lucky.”
So Ginobili, in typical dramatic fashion, flipped a pass over his head right to Mills, who had hustled to the corner, for what appeared to be a wide-open three-pointer.
“[Patty] threw it to me, and I didn’t think I had an open look, so I just tried to bait towards the middle to let Patty get to the corner,” Ginobili said.
But Adams, making yet another absolutely spectacular play, raced across the court, leaped in the air and contested Mills’s shot — causing it to fall well short of the hoop.
“I don’t know, man,” Adams said when asked if he affected Mills’s shot. “I saw the pass and did my best to contest it. I don’t know if I influenced his shot, but I’ll take it.”
Three seconds left
This is where the real insanity begins.
As Mills’s shot fell short, a battle broke out under the basket, with players from both teams descending on the rim to get their hands on the ball. Thunder forward Serge Ibaka found himself between both Kawhi Leonard and LaMarcus Aldridge, and was doing whatever he could to keep either one of them from grabbing a loose ball for a potential game-winning offensive rebound and putback.
“I knew it was the last minute, and I had to give everything I had,” Ibaka said. “I had to give everything I had for my team, you know?
“I knew it was very important, so I got up against Leonard. .. I had to choose which one and so I bumped him a little bit, and when I saw Leonard had the ball, I tried to tip the ball and go Aldridge’s way.”
What Ibaka actually did, as the above picture shows, was grab Aldridge’s jersey and nearly rip it off his body. He basically never let go, as Aldridge tried to corral the ball and go back up with it, ensuring Aldridge — who finished with 41 points — never had a real chance to make a game-winning basket.
“I thought I had the ball,” Aldridge said. “I thought [Ibaka] had a good chunk of my jersey. I thought there were some things happening that maybe shouldn’t have happened.
“But it’s over now. You can’t keep harping on it.”
“Those are the kind of plays, you have to make them nasty,” Ibaka said. “You have to make them nasty, to do whatever it takes to get a win.”
Meanwhile, Adams found himself in another situation when, after barreling past Mills to contest his three-point attempt, he had his arm held by a fan as he tried to climb back onto the court and potentially get back into the action.
To be fair, it looked like a woman Adams ran over as he contested the shot was simply trying to get back on her feet. But it wound up being a fitting final moment to what was an insane final 13.5 seconds of Game 2.
For all of the potential controversy about the result, however, one thing isn’t changing: the Thunder came away with the victory, and despite the no-calls on both sides, the Spurs still had their chances to win the game.
“It’s not the play that decided anything,” Ginobili said, “because we got the steal, we got the shot, we got an offensive rebound.
“It doesn’t matter, and it’s over. I’m not going to be able to change it. Nobody’s going to change it. We’ve got to try to go to [Oklahoma City] and try to win a game.”
That may be true. But it won’t stop the next three days from being an endless debate about the merits of these final seconds of Game 2, and how everything on all sides — from the way both teams played it to how the referees called it — was handled from start to finish.



1.  After watching the video.  What do you think the call should have been? Violation on the inbounder or the defense?

2. Why?

3.  Do you think officiating alone causes team to win or loss? Why?

4. Which team won the game?

5.



18 comments:

Griffin kirsch said...

1:Violation on Waiters, the inbounder
2:Crossed line and pushed defender to make space
3: offical can play into a team losing but is not
the only reason they lose. The result of the game is from the performance throught the whole game and in this case the spurs did not perform well
4:thunder

Anonymous said...

Seif Younis

1. They should have called a violation on the inbounder.

2. This is because he appeared to offensively, not defensively, bump someone while also out of bounds.

3. I definitely don't think officiating alone can cause a team to win or lose. While at times, officiating teams that are neck in neck may cause one of them to be pushed over the edge to victory, winning largely comes from a team's amount of skill and effort made in pursuing victory.

4. The Oklahoma City Thunder won the game.

Anonymous said...

1. Violation on the inbounder
2. because he pushed ginobli off to create space for the pass
3. no, but this game it did
4. Thunder won

-Justin Nguyen

Francis Gomez said...

1) it should've been a no call. If I had to choose I would believe that the defender was at fault
2) the offensive player always has the advantage in these situations
3) Probably, because if anything had been called on the thunder the Spurs would have gotten a chance
4) OKC

Anonymous said...

1.The violation should be on the inbounder
2.This is because the inbounder hit the defender which should have been an offensive foul and maybe
even a flagrant foul.
3.Yes because unless the teams are drastically far apart in skill the officials can dictate who gets
the ball and if they get the free throws.This is all instrumental in deciding the game
4.OKC won the game.



(Prajit Dharmavaratha pd.6)

Anonymous said...

1. Violation on the inbounder
2. You can't push him when you're inbounding the ball
3. No Officiating doesn't cause a team to win or lose.
4.Thunder

Thomas Nguyen

Unknown said...

1. I think it should have been a violation on the Thunder and San Antonio's ball.
2. I think that San Antonio was just playing good defense and got ripped off when the Thunder didn't get called on either penalties.
3.I think that the Referees never determine the game, and the Spurs did still have a chance to win.
4. Thunder

Anonymous said...

Julian Levin 5-17-16 Pd. 6
1. I think that it should have been a violation on the inbounder.
2. Dion Waiters, the inbounder, shoved the defender, and then committed a secon violation when he jumped to make the pass. Because he comitted two infractions, it should have been Spurs ball.
3. I don't think officiating alone causes teams to win or lose, but it can have an impact on the outcome of a game. Teams win and lose games based on how they play. Refs are just there to control the action, and try to make the game as fair as possible. Ultimately, players make winning, or losing plays.
4. The Thunder won the game 98-97.

Anonymous said...

1)defense
2) can't push someone that's inbounding the ball
3)lose because it's against the rules
4) thunder

-Michael lin

Anonymous said...

Devesh Agarwal
1. Foul
2. Dion waiters got elbowed
3. No but gives a very big disadvantage to the team
4. Thunder

Anonymous said...

1.Violation on the inbounder
2.Because he stepped forwards and made contact with Manu Ginobli.
3.Neither because the Spurs ended up getting the ball back anyways
4.The Thunder
Jonathan London

Anonymous said...

1.Violation on the inbounder
2.Because he stepped forwards and made contact with the defender.
3.Loss because the Spurs could have set up a play if they called the right call at the end of the game
4.Thunder
Alex Kuang

Anonymous said...

Jason li

1. Call should be on inbounder
2. Technical for stepping over line
3. Too many fouls and close to fouls to call, any officiating at a 1 point game with 14 secs left will have huge impacts. Ex: more freethrows
4. Thunder

Anonymous said...

1. The call should have been an offensive foul on the inbounder.
2. The inbounder clearly elbowed to player playing defense,which is an obvious foul.
3. I think officiating alone causes the refs to miss some major plays, such as flops and fouls such as this
4. The Thunder
Mark Gottfried

Anonymous said...

1.violation on defense
2. cause ginobli touched ibaka
3.a ref can determine whether u win the game or not. an example is a so a foul could win the game or not.
4. OKC
KAMAAL KUSOW

Anonymous said...

1. Violation on the inbounder
2. He cann't stepped forwards and made contact with the defender
3. loss, if judgement made right dicision, spurs would win.
4. The Thunder
Yuchen li

Anonymous said...

1.) Violation on the inbounder
2.) He stepped forward and made contact with Ginobili
3.) NO because there are other factors prior to the calls that determine it but in a close game, maybe.
4.) Thunder

Kwame Frimpong

Anonymous said...

1. Violation on inbounder
2. He stepped forward and made contact with defender
3.no because it's not the only reason they lost.
4. Thunder

Brian Barrett