As we are wrapping up and 3 on 3 unit, I thought it would be a good idea to start taking a look the NBA play-offs, since 5 on 5 will be our next unit. As a player and Coach, I often question officiating. Please read the article below and answer the following questions.
The insane details of the best 13.5 seconds of the NBA playoffs
It was a memorable sequence for a variety of reasons – one that included several possible violations and fouls, none of which were called. And, in a strange twist that basically didn’t matter, San Antonio got a chance to take the lead in the final moments.
Here’s how those final seconds played out, including thoughts from virtually everyone involved in the play, which you can see in its entirety below:
After LaMarcus Aldridge was fouled by Serge Ibaka on a three-pointer and made all three free throws to pull San Antonio within 98-97, the Thunder called its final timeout. Coach Billy Donovan had Dion Waiters inbound the ball on the sideline.
“Man, to be honest with you, I was caught up in the game,” Waiters said. “I don’t really know what happened, to be honest with you.
“My whole thing was trying to get the ball in there with no timeouts.”
As Waiters moved perilously close to committing a five-second infraction, he appeared to panic. First, he used his arm to push Manu Ginobili, who was defending him on the play, away from him to create enough space to inbound the ball.
“I don’t know what it is, to tell you the truth, what type of violation it is. It had to be something.”
It turned out to be something, as crew chief Ken Mauer said to a pool reporter after Monday’s game that Waiters had committed an offensive foul on the play, and the ball should’ve been given to San Antonio.
Waiters then committed a second violation – he jumped in the air to make the pass, which an inbounder is not allowed to do.
“I didn’t really get a look at it,” Waiters said. “But hopefully they’re going to look at it and they’ll see he stepped out and it should’ve been a tech, too, but it’s not up to me.
“If you go look at it, you’ll see. It should’ve been a tech and the ball back. But when they go look at it and they’ll figure it out, and they’ll see the truth, it’s a play on.”
What was unclear was whether Ginobili stepped over the line (he appeared to step on it, which is apparently allowed, but not over it, which is not). And it’s also unclear if Ginobili gave Waiters enough room to inbound the ball.
12.9 seconds left
Waiters eventually lobbed the ball into Kevin Durant at center court – where he was being guarded by Spurs guard Danny Green. For some reason, though, the game clock started before anyone touched the ball, meaning an extra half-second went off before Durant’s hands got on it.
“I thought maybe they would call something [on Waiters],” Green said. “I wasn’t sure. I was trying to see where he was going, I tried to deny. [Then] I thought maybe he would call timeout, and I was just at that one point, once you deny, I was trying to play safety.
“I could see where [Waiters] was looking, and I thought maybe we would’ve got a call, but we didn’t. But he threw it up, and I just went to try to go get it.”
As Durant fell to the ground, it appeared Green may have gotten a piece of him as he poked the ball away. But after Green hesitated for a moment — only to realize nothing was going to be called — he immediately began to seek an opportunity to press his advantage.
Once Green had the ball, he saw two people ahead of him — Thunder center Steven Adams and Spurs guard Patty Mills. Green tried to loop the ball over Adams’s head to Mills, but his pass was long, forcing Mills to almost go under the basket to catch it. On top of that, Green had missed Ginobili streaking past him on his right. If he had seen him, it would’ve resulted in a simple 2-on-1 and a likely layup for the Spurs.
“I saw Adams in front of me. I didn’t know if they called [a foul] or not, but I wanted to make sure I got the ball first,” Green said. “But I saw Adams in front of me, I saw Patty, and [Adams] is a big body so I just tried to throw it over top of him.
“It was a lofty pass, it wasn’t a good one, and it took some time to get there, but I didn’t have a chance to see who was to the right of me, and it was Manu.”
Eight seconds left
After Mills wound up with the ball under the basket, he swung it over to Ginobili, who had run past Green and back into the play. From there, Ginobili dribbled into the lane — where Adams was there again, standing between Ginobili and the basket.
“We were just trying to inbound it and then it was just a scramble, mate,” Adams said. “I just tried to do the best I could.
“The team did, scrambling, and contest everything. We got lucky. We got really lucky.”
So Ginobili, in typical dramatic fashion, flipped a pass over his head right to Mills, who had hustled to the corner, for what appeared to be a wide-open three-pointer.
But Adams, making yet another absolutely spectacular play, raced across the court, leaped in the air and contested Mills’s shot — causing it to fall well short of the hoop.
“I don’t know, man,” Adams said when asked if he affected Mills’s shot. “I saw the pass and did my best to contest it. I don’t know if I influenced his shot, but I’ll take it.”
Three seconds left
This is where the real insanity begins.
“I knew it was the last minute, and I had to give everything I had,” Ibaka said. “I had to give everything I had for my team, you know?
“I knew it was very important, so I got up against Leonard. .. I had to choose which one and so I bumped him a little bit, and when I saw Leonard had the ball, I tried to tip the ball and go Aldridge’s way.”
“I thought I had the ball,” Aldridge said. “I thought [Ibaka] had a good chunk of my jersey. I thought there were some things happening that maybe shouldn’t have happened.
“But it’s over now. You can’t keep harping on it.”
“Those are the kind of plays, you have to make them nasty,” Ibaka said. “You have to make them nasty, to do whatever it takes to get a win.”
Meanwhile, Adams found himself in another situation when, after barreling past Mills to contest his three-point attempt, he had his arm held by a fan as he tried to climb back onto the court and potentially get back into the action.
“It’s not the play that decided anything,” Ginobili said, “because we got the steal, we got the shot, we got an offensive rebound.
That may be true. But it won’t stop the next three days from being an endless debate about the merits of these final seconds of Game 2, and how everything on all sides — from the way both teams played it to how the referees called it — was handled from start to finish.
2. Why?
3. Do you think officiating alone causes team to win or loss? Why?
4. Which team won the game?
5.
18 comments:
1:Violation on Waiters, the inbounder
2:Crossed line and pushed defender to make space
3: offical can play into a team losing but is not
the only reason they lose. The result of the game is from the performance throught the whole game and in this case the spurs did not perform well
4:thunder
Seif Younis
1. They should have called a violation on the inbounder.
2. This is because he appeared to offensively, not defensively, bump someone while also out of bounds.
3. I definitely don't think officiating alone can cause a team to win or lose. While at times, officiating teams that are neck in neck may cause one of them to be pushed over the edge to victory, winning largely comes from a team's amount of skill and effort made in pursuing victory.
4. The Oklahoma City Thunder won the game.
1. Violation on the inbounder
2. because he pushed ginobli off to create space for the pass
3. no, but this game it did
4. Thunder won
-Justin Nguyen
1) it should've been a no call. If I had to choose I would believe that the defender was at fault
2) the offensive player always has the advantage in these situations
3) Probably, because if anything had been called on the thunder the Spurs would have gotten a chance
4) OKC
1.The violation should be on the inbounder
2.This is because the inbounder hit the defender which should have been an offensive foul and maybe
even a flagrant foul.
3.Yes because unless the teams are drastically far apart in skill the officials can dictate who gets
the ball and if they get the free throws.This is all instrumental in deciding the game
4.OKC won the game.
(Prajit Dharmavaratha pd.6)
1. Violation on the inbounder
2. You can't push him when you're inbounding the ball
3. No Officiating doesn't cause a team to win or lose.
4.Thunder
Thomas Nguyen
1. I think it should have been a violation on the Thunder and San Antonio's ball.
2. I think that San Antonio was just playing good defense and got ripped off when the Thunder didn't get called on either penalties.
3.I think that the Referees never determine the game, and the Spurs did still have a chance to win.
4. Thunder
Julian Levin 5-17-16 Pd. 6
1. I think that it should have been a violation on the inbounder.
2. Dion Waiters, the inbounder, shoved the defender, and then committed a secon violation when he jumped to make the pass. Because he comitted two infractions, it should have been Spurs ball.
3. I don't think officiating alone causes teams to win or lose, but it can have an impact on the outcome of a game. Teams win and lose games based on how they play. Refs are just there to control the action, and try to make the game as fair as possible. Ultimately, players make winning, or losing plays.
4. The Thunder won the game 98-97.
1)defense
2) can't push someone that's inbounding the ball
3)lose because it's against the rules
4) thunder
-Michael lin
Devesh Agarwal
1. Foul
2. Dion waiters got elbowed
3. No but gives a very big disadvantage to the team
4. Thunder
1.Violation on the inbounder
2.Because he stepped forwards and made contact with Manu Ginobli.
3.Neither because the Spurs ended up getting the ball back anyways
4.The Thunder
Jonathan London
1.Violation on the inbounder
2.Because he stepped forwards and made contact with the defender.
3.Loss because the Spurs could have set up a play if they called the right call at the end of the game
4.Thunder
Alex Kuang
Jason li
1. Call should be on inbounder
2. Technical for stepping over line
3. Too many fouls and close to fouls to call, any officiating at a 1 point game with 14 secs left will have huge impacts. Ex: more freethrows
4. Thunder
1. The call should have been an offensive foul on the inbounder.
2. The inbounder clearly elbowed to player playing defense,which is an obvious foul.
3. I think officiating alone causes the refs to miss some major plays, such as flops and fouls such as this
4. The Thunder
Mark Gottfried
1.violation on defense
2. cause ginobli touched ibaka
3.a ref can determine whether u win the game or not. an example is a so a foul could win the game or not.
4. OKC
KAMAAL KUSOW
1. Violation on the inbounder
2. He cann't stepped forwards and made contact with the defender
3. loss, if judgement made right dicision, spurs would win.
4. The Thunder
Yuchen li
1.) Violation on the inbounder
2.) He stepped forward and made contact with Ginobili
3.) NO because there are other factors prior to the calls that determine it but in a close game, maybe.
4.) Thunder
Kwame Frimpong
1. Violation on inbounder
2. He stepped forward and made contact with defender
3.no because it's not the only reason they lost.
4. Thunder
Brian Barrett
Post a Comment